The Personal Promise Bible:
Have you ever inserted your name as you read the Bible to make it more personal? Now you can experience the reality of God's love and promises in a way you never thought possible. In the Personal Promise Bible, you will read your first name personalized in over 5,000 places throughout the New Testament with Psalms and Proverbs, over 7,000 places throughout the complete Old and New Testaments.
Here's a sample (you can get a sample on the website):
John 3:15-16 Melinda has eternal life in Christ.
Melinda, believing in Him, shall not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved Melinda , that He gave His one and only Son, that Melinda, believing in Him, should not perish, but have eternal life.
I can see the appeal, but I'm really troubled by this. In a good-hearted desire to help people understand God's personal love for them, this is tampering with God's Word and feeding the self-absorption common in our culture.
Christianity affirms verbal inspiration for the Bible. That means the very words were God-breathed, not the general message, but the actual words. Playing with the words shouldn't be taken lightly even for good intentions. God gave us His Word, we take it as He gave it taking the words seriously.
Even a simple substitution changes the nature of the message in John 3:16. It was given as a corporate message about the world, but now it's individualized. That has already changed the meaning. How far do they go? Do the titles of the books get my name inserted: The Letter to Melinda?
Christians are very prone to reading verses out of context and reading in their own subjective interpretation and application. This only perpetuates that mistake.
Not everything in the Bible is about us. This has tremendous potential to distort the meaning of passages. And it perpetuates a sinful cultural trend to focus on ourselves. I have to wonder whether any of the curses or judgments get my name substituted. We have this tendancy when attempting to apply Bible verses out of context to only abscond with the good stuff that doesn't always have justification in the historical context (like blessings in the Old Testament). We want the good news and not the bad. So I'd bet that they haven't personalized much of the bad news.
The desire to help people understand God's love for them is a good thing put to bad use in this Bible. Frankly, I think it's condescending and dangerous. God has revealed His Word (words) to us in Scripture and we have to grow up in Christ to learn to read and understand the text, not substitute ourselves smack-dab in the text. We can communicate God's love without tampering with His Word.