« A Practical Guide to Prayer | Main | Redefining Christianity »

March 30, 2007


Macaroni was a kind of hat they wore. It was a smaller version of those three-pointed hats folks used to wear back then.

I guess the real mystery is why those Kraft noodles are called macaroni.

What does this blog have anything to do with the religious?

Even the 24 blogs make points that could be strewn as religious points...

Slow news day at STR?

Let's see...

Its about recognizing a macaroni as a hick...

Its about making sure the macaroni is called a hick...

Its about calling someone a hick...

Its about name calling!

By winsome "embassadors"?

Oh, I know Tom, I can't believe it - winsome ambassadors (not "embassadors") enjoying trivia! What a contradiction! What hypocrites!

I guess about as bad as them engaging in a little sarcastic humor to make a point...

Only a hick would spell the word embassadors.

Sorry...AAAAAAAAAmbassadors. I'm doing my best at English.

Trivia or Sarcastic Humor?

Meaningless trivia or veiled insults?

It's not too hard to determine your motive.

Frank is a namecaller too, but at least he just gets to the point.

Still, not very winsome.

Did I spell winsome right guys?

I'm not beholden to Koukhl, your standard-bearer, your moral-lawgiver.

Oh...that's right...you have another moral lawgiver.

Where does it say insulting someone is wrong?

I guess it didn't make the top ten, so I guess we can let it slide.

Oh...wait a minute...
Matt 5:22. "But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be guilty before the court; and whoever says to his brother, 'You good-for-nothing,' shall be guilty before the supreme court; and whoever says, `You fool,' shall be guilty enough to go into the fiery hell.



My above post was made in jest and good humor (even self-deprecating, a little) - my apologies if it didn't come out that way, it was not intended as a veiled insult - but my point still stands. Melinda was obviously not calling anyone anything with her original post, and I was only engaging jokingly to what seemed like a half-joking post by you. Sorry for any misconstruance (as well as the spell-checking - a bad habit of my anal-retentive mind). Hope that cleared up any question as to my motivation (i.e., to answer your original accusation with an apparently failed attempt at wit).

By the way, I'm certainly not angry with you, and the only name I can think of ever having called you is Tom.

P.S. This one is probably going to go over like a lead balloon, too, but did you ever hear the one about the guy who called everyone a name-caller...? :)

Matt18:15. "If your brother sins, go and show him his fault in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother.
16. "But if he does not listen to you, take one or two more with you, so that BY THE MOUTH OF TWO OR THREE WITNESSES EVERY FACT MAY BE CONFIRMED.

Apology accepted.

The comments to this entry are closed.