Many Christians don't talk with their friends, colleagues, neighbors, or even strangers about Christianity because they are worried about offending them. Offense is a fairly common cry these days when certain issues are raised. But I think most of the time the claim to be offended is just a way of stopping the conversation, actually manipulating the Christian to stopping. After all, offense is a certain thing. The dictionary says that it's an insult or disregard for someone. Sure, offense is the state of the person claiming it, but it's reasonable to ask what has been said in the nature of an insult or disregard. If you haven't behaved that way, I suspect it's just a cry to stop the conversation so it can be avoided rather than responded to. Offense is most often the tactic of the modern nothing of tolerance that doesn't even tolerate different points of view and requires conformity in silence.
On the other hand, the worry about offending others that stops Christians from witnessing can often be an excuse, especially since most Christians engaging in friendly witnessing encounters don't behave in an offensive way. There's nothing inherently offensive about a conversation about important issues you and your friend disagree about.
Don't be intimidated when "offense" is used to shut you up. And don't intimidate yourself by unrealistic worries about being offended. Engage people in a winsome way. And make sure you really aren't offensive.
For me, what stops me from being super vocal about what I believe (unless I'm asked, which I am a lot for some reason), is a belief (rightly or wrongly) that what I say won't really matter to the person in their mind. It is the whole "post-modernism" thing with "oh well, that's right for you, but not for me." When so many people disregard my belief system as simply a "choice" and not a matter of right and wrong, then is discouraging. Still...I know that that is no excuse to not get back up on the horse again. It's just a matter of doing it.
When someone asks me about what I believe, particularly the things that might be deemed "offensive," I speak freely on it though.
Posted by: Joel Bain | October 08, 2007 at 09:02 AM
"Winsome" is such a great word. Although the etymology is not the same it makes me think of "win some" as in "win some, lose some." It requires a freedom from pessimism to not think "lose all" so that effort is deemed worthwhile.
Posted by: Alvin | October 08, 2007 at 11:51 AM
Joel brings up a great point. If you have good relationships with people and talk to them respectfully, they will tend to disagree but at least respect you.
But start claiming that something is actually true and factual - whether someone believes it or not - and watch them flip out!
Claiming such a thing is absolutely prohibited in our culture. And if you stick to your guns, you will often find yourself losing friends - even friends that you've known for years, and with whom you have worked hard to develop a good and open relationship. It is absolutely not tolerated. (And this, in a culture where 'tolerance' is supposed to be the highest virtue!)
I know this from experience. I've lost friends that I've known for years, people who knew that I loved them and that I thought loved me too. People *do not* want to hear truth. Of any sort.
Posted by: Mo | October 08, 2007 at 12:55 PM
This, Joel, is exactly why Francis Schaeffer said that we need to do more "pre-evangelism" than we normally tend to do when we share our faith (see _The God Who Is There_). Maybe it would be of some help to you to think in these terms when sharing your faith - think of disabusing people of their errant ideas about truth as a way of laying the groundwork for your message to be heard the way you want it to. It is important that they understand first the KIND of claim you are making.
Posted by: Aaron Snell | October 08, 2007 at 04:15 PM
This reminds me of Koukl's relativism speech, the paradox of not tolerating intolerance, judging people for being judgmental, etc. Fear of being offensive to others or being offended and judged by others makes relationships shallow or even totally fake. If you're hesitant to share your beliefs, if you're too ashamed or embarrassed of what you believe to talk about it maybe you need to reexamine what you believe and why you believe it.
I think the reason most people don't share their beliefs is because deep down they know there's something wrong with it, even though they don't want to admit it or haven't consciously realized it. If you have a world view that separates people into "us" and "them" as most religions do, perhaps you should be ashamed to share it, perhaps you should keep your mouth shut.
Posted by: Steve | October 09, 2007 at 08:07 AM
Steve, any world view separates people into 'us' and 'them' - even if it's the 'us' and 'them' division between those who believe something is true simply if you believe it, versus those who do not subscribe to that view.
My head hurts now.
Posted by: Mo | October 09, 2007 at 09:42 AM
Not all world views make divisions. Many eastern ways of thinking, like Taoism or Buddhism, accept the mysterious truth that all is one. Yes, divisions are necessary to live in the real world, you would go crazy without using divisions and categories to make judgments and decisions. But you can always step back and realize that all is one, that divisions are illusions. Meditation, contemplation of this fact grants a powerful wisdom. I think this is what the gospel means by the idea that we are all children of God, that we are all brothers and sisters.
Posted by: Steve | October 09, 2007 at 11:34 AM