The Newsroom at LDS.org posted this in response to the current controversy:
Recent political events have once again brought the “Mormons aren’t Christians,” “Mormons are a cult” epithets into the national spotlight. In his “On Faith” commentary this week, Church Public Affairs managing director Michael Otterson suggests why people make such claims and shares his own experience of being labeled not Christian.
Otterson says one problem is that half the U.S. population knows very little about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. However, he says, this may be changing.
“Research shows that people have a far better view of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints when they know a member personally,” Otterson says. “There is a point when those people who have seen Mormons caricatured in their Sunday School classes realize that the second-hand prejudices they have learned don’t fit with their first-hand experiences with faithful Latter-day Saints.”
Otterson's commentary explains further:
If you try to track the number of references to Jesus Christ in the service, you may lose count. So just observe the families, listen to the prayers, leaf through the hymn book to see if any of the hymns seem familiar, and make up your own mind as to how Christian our people are. Jesus taught us: “By their fruits, ye shall know them.”
I think a great deal of confusion is happening because people aren't defining their terms. The word "Christian" actually means something. It doesn't simply refer to a person who follows the ethical teachings in the New Testament, nor does it refer to everyone who uses the name "Jesus." Christianity entails an entire worldview—a particular view of God, man, salvation, purpose, heaven and hell, etc.
Christianity is a religion with one self-existent, eternal, Trinitarian God. In Mormonism, they worship a Father God (but many other gods exist for other worlds), who has a physical body and most likely has not always been a god, but was born into another world and advanced to perfection by following his Father's plan of salvation. Jesus and the Holy Spirit are also gods.
Christianity teaches that men and women were created by a God who will forever be infinitely greater than His creatures. Mormonism teaches that we are of the same species as God (begotten in the pre-existence by Heavenly Father and Mother, as Jesus was), and if we follow the right path and fulfill all the requirements, we can become gods of our own worlds.
The same kinds of distinctions could be made in all the other areas I mentioned. These are not unimportant distinctions, they're radically different understandings of core concepts. So it's not an epithet to say that Christianity and Mormonism are very different—different enough to require different names. This conclusion is not a matter of emotion, fear, or hatred.
But I think perhaps when we say that Mormons aren't Christian, we ought to take a moment to explain what we mean. We're not saying they're weird, scary people, or that they're being brainwashed or controlled by a cult leader, or that they're immoral. We're merely saying that the word "Christian" actually means something, and it has meant that thing for centuries. To claim that their theology fits into that word is to misunderstand what is meant by "Christian."
Mormons may believe that they are more truly following Christ and His plan of salvation than we are (since they have the restored priesthood, the temples, the covenants and ordinances, and more scripture) and so, are more deserving of the name Christian; but even if they were correct about this, to appropriate the name Christian now is to imply that they're just another denomination, and that is just confusing and misleading. And to demand that we call them Christian is to ask us to say that the nature of God, man, and salvation—the very heart of Christianity—is unimportant, or at least, less important than mere moral behavior. It's not fair or reasonable to ask this of us.
I think many Mormons aren't familiar with Christian doctrine, and so they may not understand why we think our two religions are different enough to consider them separate religions. And to make matters more confusing, we use some of the same theological words but assume different meanings for those words. So if this issue comes up, take some time to define each term and explore the differences so they know you're not saying they aren't Christian out of prejudice or ignorance, it's just a matter of recognizing the fundamental differences in our theology.
You hit the nail(s) on the head(pun intented). Jesus is Lord and ONE with the ONE true God of all creation, the Great I Am. He's not the made over false god version of any false teacher like Joseph Smith, but rather the Lord God as presented in the Bible. He IS The beginning and end of the greastest story of all that ever was, is, or will be.
Posted by: Todd Thomas | October 14, 2011 at 04:09 AM
Christians aren't Mormons, whatever Mormons may be!
Posted by: kpolo | October 14, 2011 at 05:45 AM
What a valuable post! Hope, among other things, itll be read by the pres candidates!
Posted by: Jim | October 14, 2011 at 10:28 AM
Isn't Christ the only one who can truly judge the Christianity of those who profess to be His disciples? The last time I checked, He hasn't delegated that Judgement.
Posted by: Daughter of Eve | October 14, 2011 at 01:53 PM
He can judge who His real followers are, but the meaning of the word "Christian" isn't hidden. It's clearly defined for all to compare against the doctrine being offered.
Even if only Mormons were true followers of Christ, it wouldn't change this fact. It would only mean that Mormons are true followers of Christ, and Christians aren't. The word describes a particular religion, regardless of who is following Christ.
Posted by: Amy | October 14, 2011 at 02:14 PM
I've had this conversation with a few people recently.
First, up until about 20 years ago Mormons had zero interest in being seen as just another denomination of Christianity. In reality as the LDS spokesperson in this article hints at, the desire to be seen as Christian is a PR move.
Not to mention the most successful mission field in all of America for Mormons is evangelicals. They have just enough understanding of the Bible that they already believe in Jesus, and are more open to hearing more revelation.
Last, if Mormons were really Christians then why are they so outraged and often cut off contact with those who leave a Mormon church for an Evangelical church?
Mormon families who have a member begin to go to an Evangelical church, are not supportive of that ever.
Posted by: Ryan K. | October 14, 2011 at 02:55 PM
Daughter, a couple fo questions, if you'll indulge me:
1) I'm curious if you have a response to Amy?
2) Do you believe there are any criteria for determining if one may be a Christian?
3) If you think there are no criteria, what does the term "Christian" mean, in your view?
4) If you think there are criteria, a) what do you say they are, b) why do you claim them as criteria, and c) from your perspective is the traditional Mormon doctrine consistent with that criteria?
Thanks -- I enjoy the dialog!
Best,
Son of Adam
Posted by: Son of Adam | October 14, 2011 at 03:59 PM
I don't understand why this is made such a big deal. To the rest of the world it seems like both of you claim to be followers of Christ. The difference is that you guys complain and whine over details that non-Christians just won't get unless they hold your view. How does that help the your cause? It just makes people think you are narrow minded. Seriously, just relax and let people call themselves whatever. Live the difference, stop whining about it. Jesus really does need new PR
Posted by: Josh | October 15, 2011 at 06:03 AM
Josh, if you say we ought to let people call themselves whatever, then why do you get to call Christians and Mormons narrow minded?
Posted by: Jesse | October 15, 2011 at 07:24 AM
Josh -
I have two small white round pills.
They're the same, right?
Wrong.
One is arsenic, one is aspirin. One kills you, the other prevents a second heart attack.
Sometimes the differences matter more than the similarities. This may be one case.
Best,
Son of Adam.
Posted by: Son of Adam | October 15, 2011 at 07:54 AM
Josh,
Sometimes Satan's agenda is advanced when we argue over minor differences.
Sometimes Satan's agenda is advanced when we fail to distinguish between major differences.
The question is, are the differences between Mormonism and Orthodox Christianity major or minor?
If they're minor, we should stop our bickering. If they're major, we should highlight the distinctions.
I can understand how this looks like petty bickering to an outsider, but as it happens, the differences between Mormonism and Orthodoxy are major and thus we cannot allow them to be swept under the rug.
Take some time to educate yourself about the differences and I'm confident you'll come to understand what all the fuss is about.
Bruce Byrne
Posted by: Bruce Byrne | October 15, 2011 at 08:54 AM
I personally believe that 5 point Calvinism, as it pertains to sin and grace, is the only true definition of Christianity.
However, unconditional love is the most recognizable mark of a true Christian.
There are many scattered throughout the cults that show the fruit of the Spirit, though theologically they are still in darkness.
God saves despite our knowledge although, when presented with the truth, those genuinely saved will become Calvinists.
Posted by: dave | October 15, 2011 at 12:05 PM
I have brought up the issue of certain groups that do not qualify as Christians in discussion before and of course I would include Mormons in the list, and have been challenged with the accusation of this being just a No True Scotsman fallacy. I came to conclude that if the thing that disqualifies a group from being considered Christian is essential to the definition of a Christian, it does not qualify as this fallacy. Am I getting this down right?
Posted by: Louis Kuhelj | October 16, 2011 at 05:51 AM
Amy, this is a really good post. Thanks. I just have one small quibble. You said:
In Mormonism, they worship a Father God (but many other gods exist for other worlds), who has a physical body and most likely has not always been a god, but was born into another world and advanced to perfection by following his Father's plan of salvation.
According to Joseph Smith, in the "King Follett Discourse," the Father laid down his life just as Jesus did, which gives me the impression that the Father was a savior figure in a previous world just as Jesus was a savior figure in our world. Jesus didn't exactly follow a plan of salvation. He himself was the plan of salvation for everybody else. In the same way, the Mormon heavenly Father probably didn't follow a plan of salvation either.
But there are different meanings of "salvation" in Mormon theology. One meaning is exaltation, so I guess you could say that since Jesus was exalted to godhood at some point that he followed some kind of plan of salvation. I don't know when Mormons believe Jesus reached godhood, but it seems like if they are consistent, they would have to say he did so sometime after his resurrection since the earthly sojourn (probation) and resurrection are part of the road to exaltation.
Posted by: Sam | October 16, 2011 at 10:47 AM
Of course the "King Follett Discourse" isn't normative for Mormons. I don't know why not since Joseph Smith claimed to be passing on divine revelation in that discourse. It seems like Mormons ought to take it more seriously than they actually do.
Posted by: Sam | October 16, 2011 at 11:02 AM
Hi Sam, if you are correct in this; "which gives me the impression that the Father was a savior figure in a previous world" there'd be an infinite regress problem for them to resolve also, unless they propose a similar [self existent, necessary being], kind of Father as the Christian view holds at some point in the past.
Posted by: Brad B | October 16, 2011 at 01:25 PM
@ Jesse
I never called anyone narrow-minded.
@ sonofadam
I'm not saying they are the same. I just think you guys need a different approach. Just like when Muslims say Christians are polytheists. It doesn't help the cause and they won't get it if they don't hold the view already. Just chill and make the distinction later.
Posted by: Josh Stewart | October 16, 2011 at 02:20 PM
Josh, We're debating the merits of the claim here. Note the distinction. I would never lead off a conversation with a Mormon by saying, "you are not a Christian", but that's not the dialog here. The dialog here is in pursuit of truth.
On the STR blog, I will definitely engage in a dialog about the merits of the claim, so that when I have the interpersonal dialog, I'm prepared in a knowledgable and winsome fashion.
Your instruction to "just chill" could be perceived as demeaning, akin to telling someone they're not a Christian.
Whatever you think of "us guys", I'm still curious what you think about the merits of theologcal claim that Mormonism and Christianity are distinct views such that one view cannot be equated with the other, and thus Mormons are not Christians?
Posted by: Son of Adam | October 16, 2011 at 03:17 PM
Doesn't it say in 1st Nephi that there would be two churches: The Mormon and the Abomination?
I am assuming that since most churches are not Mormon, they must be in the category of Abomination?
Posted by: Trent | October 16, 2011 at 06:41 PM
Josh
"I don't understand why this is made such a big deal"
Matters that determine where one will spend eternity, is a big deal.
Posted by: Louis Kuhelj | October 16, 2011 at 07:48 PM
Brad, from what I understand, a lot of the Mormons have no problem with infinite regresses. One of the professors from BYU (I can't remember who) responded to Bill Craig and Paul Copan's chapter in The New Mormon Challenge where Craig and Copan argued that there can't be an infinite series of events or intervals of time in the past. The BYU professor disagreed with them. I don't know if his view was representative of most Mormons, though, and I'm pretty sure the LDS church has no official position on that. Most of the Mormons I've talked to just say they don't know or that it hasn't been revealed whether eternal progression has been going on forever or if it had an absolute beginning.
Posted by: Sam | October 16, 2011 at 10:08 PM
Josh's 'I don't understand why this made such a big deal' seems to argue that the central distinctives of Mormonism and Christianity are just cosmetic additions which don't need to be differentiated. It's a pretty condescending approach to a couple of major religions to conflate them with out even giving some decent criteria.
Posted by: Jim | October 16, 2011 at 10:10 PM
Josh, It's hardly a reason to refrain from getting clear on a subject just because there are some who fail to recognize the importance of that subject. Now clearly, if you and I were on the street, I probably wouldn't lead with the doctrinal distinctives of Christianity versus Mormonism. But that's just a function of what presents itself as relevant in a particular conversation.
Posted by: Tel | October 17, 2011 at 12:14 AM
Sam, I think Mormons believe different things about this. Some say that the Father was a sinner on another planet. Is it possible that he sinned, followed the plan of salvation, and then died for everyone else's sins? I don't know what they would say or how they would reconcile this.
But I do know that if every Mormon has the chance to become the god of a world, then it's not necessarily the case that our god didn't follow a plan of salvation, as well. Although, if he died for his people, I don't know... I've never understood how Jesus became a god without following the plan, or how the Holy Spirit became a god without ever even receiving a body.
I wish they had official systematic theologies. It would make analysis so much easier.
Posted by: Amy | October 17, 2011 at 08:57 AM
I wish they had official systematic theologies. It would make analysis so much easier.
Amen.
Posted by: Sam | October 17, 2011 at 09:28 AM
Thirty years ago, the statement that "Mormonism is a cult" wouldn't have even been controversial. These days, the general public do not know what Mormonism teaches, but worse still, they no longer know what Christianity teaches, either.
I was just trying to think of any major orthodox Christian doctrine that the LDS agrees with and I'm coming up empty. I can't think of one.
I remember years ago hearing Walter Martin saying "If I accept you as a Christian, will you accept me as a Mormon?"
Posted by: Tom Taylor | October 17, 2011 at 12:26 PM
Try this for fun with Mormon Missionaries.
Claim outright to be "Mormon", then engage in theological discussion, asserting the principles of "Christian" orthodoxy.
Then note the point in the discussion when they say "Wait a minute you're NOT a Mormon we don't believe those things"!
This tactic should eliminate UPFRONT the dishonest non-sensical claim that Mormons are Christians.
Posted by: John Plough | October 17, 2011 at 01:56 PM
Amy, is William Lane Craig a Christian, since he denies the Chalcedonian formulation of the incarnation? Or, how about those Christians prior to the 4th century who did not have a fully-formed understanding of Trinitarian theology? Paul, I suspect, was not a Nicean Trinitarian. Was Paul not a Christian?
I raise these question not to defend Mormonism. Rather, to suggest that we have to be very careful when we start concluding that those who claim to follow Christ are not Christians because they have not fully grasped or embraced an understanding that they may not be intellectually or constitutionally disposed to entertain. Interestingly enough, Arius of Alexandria, though a heretic, was not declared not Christian. So, perhaps there are Christians--and I suspect there have been millions of them--who are wrong in their theology but have been touched by the grace of God and the power of Christ.
Posted by: Francis Beckwith | October 18, 2011 at 09:45 AM
Frank, with the title, I was quoting the article, or I would have gone with "'Mormonism is Not Christian' Is Not...." My point is not to single out individuals, but to talk about the religion as a whole, which has a completely different worldview from Christianity, regardless of what an individual here or there may think.
I don't have a problem generalizing this, even if it is possible that there is an individual Mormon who is a true follower of Christ. Particularly since if there are such individuals, they ought to be warned in the strongest terms that their church is not teaching the truth about God in their most central, core teachings.
Posted by: Amy | October 18, 2011 at 10:46 AM
Posted by: Daron | October 18, 2011 at 11:02 AM
If GOD has the power to change a persons sinful nature so they turn toward him as opposed to running away, wouldn't he at the very least have the power to give them correct "theological" thinking especially on major issues?
Could GOD not teach a mormon the truth of the "Trinity"?
The biblical answer is "yes", therefore "mormons" aren't Christians in the salvivic sense, they are just nice people. Though they are "nice" people, they are "nice" fallen people, much like the Pharisees who were white washed on the outside like a tomb but inside they are full of dead bodies.
Mormonism is nothing more than a man-centered works righteousness reliogen. Sort of like Bhuddism with the word "jesus" sprinkled in for flavor.
If you ever actually do find a Christian mormon, I guarantee you he will tell you he is a Christian EX-mormon.
Posted by: John Plough | October 22, 2011 at 10:41 AM
Their doctrines are unbiblical.
Against being saved by works: Ephesians 2: 8For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
9Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Against the doctrine of ongoing revelation: Hebrews 15: 8Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
Against the doctrine of eternal marriage:
Matthew 22: 23The same day came to him the Sadducees, which say that there is no resurrection, and asked him,
24Saying, Master, Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.
25Now there were with us seven brethren: and the first, when he had married a wife, deceased, and, having no issue, left his wife unto his brother:
26Likewise the second also, and the third, unto the seventh.
27And last of all the woman died also.
28Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven? for they all had her.
29Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.
30For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.
Posted by: Dylan | December 01, 2011 at 06:20 PM