I heard a man I respect (religious, but not Christian) object to the Christian idea that a person can only get to heaven “through Christianity,” his response being that “God cares more about behavior than theology.” That is, the Christian idea (or rather, what he understands to be the Christian idea) that it’s belief in Jesus that makes a person heaven-worthy doesn’t make sense to him. God is clearly concerned about moral categories—good and evil. Therefore, he says, it doesn’t matter what you believe, as long as you’re a good person.
But this man has misunderstood Christianity. The difference between us is not that Christians think God doesn’t care about behavior, the difference is that Christians think God cares a great deal more about behavior than this man thinks God cares.
This man thinks his behavior passes God’s standard for heaven-worthy behavior, but Christians think the standard is much higher—that the standard is perfect, in fact, and that God’s holiness would rightly destroy any of us who tried to stand before Him based on our behavior. In other words, God cares so much about behavior that we all face His righteous and perfect condemnation.
Is this too high a standard? Does this make God unreasonable? No, this makes God perfectly just. This man wants God to care about moral categories. The bad news for him is that God does care. Perfectly and completely. There’s no grading on a curve, there’s no compromising justice.
This puts us in a very bad position. When Isaiah—a very prophet of God who wrote part of the Bible, no less—came face to face with God, He realized what a bad position he was in, crying out, “Woe is me, for I am ruined! Because I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips; For my eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts" (Isaiah 6:5).
From the murderer who considers himself a good person (as I read in a blog post by a murderer in prison once) to this man who wants God to care about behavior, we all fool ourselves into thinking we’re good by comparing ourselves to the sinful people around us. We can all pass the test if we just lower the standard. But as with Isaiah, when we finally see Perfection, we will see ourselves as we really are and despair.
So Christianity takes behavior quite seriously. Nothing in Christianity would make sense without that. The reason Christians think we need to trust in Jesus and be joined to Him in order to be heaven-worthy is that we need Him to stand before God in our place precisely because His behavior was perfect and His sacrifice on the cross fulfilled the justice we deserved on our behalf. In this way only can we stand—not because God will lower His standard for us, but because He upheld His perfect righteousness and justice through Jesus.
The alternative is to say that God doesn’t perfectly care about behavior or justice—that He’s willing to accept a certain level of sin. That is not a good alternative for a perfect God.
But not all Christians believe that, do they?
Some believe that righteousness is imparted at baptism don't they? Which means the baby, when baptised, enters the prelapsarian state and only concupiscence remains? I think that's the Catholic and Orthodox view, isn't it?
in other words, not all Christians believe there are reprobate or that we're totally depraved, do they?
And what about Unconditional Election and the Perseverance of the Saints ('Once Saved, Always Saved')? How does that tie with God caring about our behaviour? Doesn't it mean were saved. Period?
I'm not a Calvinist, so I'm sorry if I've misunderstood these ideas, but they seem to imply God is arbitrary as to who's saved and who's damned so how do behaviours matter?
I'm really confused!
Any light shed on any misunderstanding, gratefully received, and I apologise in advance if I've got them all wrong and misrepresented them!
Posted by: Peter Northcott | February 27, 2013 at 06:04 AM
Hi Peter, you raise a few good points that I hope to let the scriptures begin to answer, maybe you can let me know what you think about these in relation to some of what you've written.
Regarding another part of you post, more Ephesians
Christian do it imperfectly, but good works are necessary evidence of being In Christ. If one has no good works, they have no reasonable expectation of assurance.
Posted by: Brad B | February 27, 2013 at 07:09 AM
Peter-
The Roman Catholics believe that good works save. (And honestly, if you think good works save, why would you be anything other than Roman Catholic?) But even they will say that there is no possibility of a person doing good works unless first redeemed by Christ and continually empowered by Christ (through the sacraments). Catholics might allow that natural faculties were not tainted by Original Sin. But other aspects of human nature, in particular the mastery of our passions, are bad enough to render the keeping of the Law impossible without the miraculous assistance of God.
So the Roman Catholic can still maintain a Full Strength view of the Law...which is one of the hallmarks of Christian thought.
Christians have this in common: we do not dumb-down the Law so that it can be followed. We recognize that the Law is perfect and beyond the natural ability of any human to keep to God's satisfaction. God does not grade on a curve, the only passing grade is 100%, and every human starts with his score already in the minus range.
Reformers, of course, have built their system upon a Full Strength view of the Law by preaching salvation by grace alone through faith alone on account of Christ alone apart from works of the Law. The Law only condemns us, and the condemnation is withering. It is only because Christ is greater than the Law that we have any hope.
Anyway, I think that all Christians do believe in a Full Strength view of the Law much as Amy described above.
Posted by: WisdomLover | February 27, 2013 at 10:42 AM
"Wannamaker learned this lesson early, but I personally had to blunder through this old world for a third of a century before it even began to dawn upon me that ninety-nine times out of a hundred, people don't criticize themselves for anything, no matter how wrong it may be." ~Dale Carnegie, How to Win Friends and Influence People
"The truth is, we believe in decency so much--we feel the Rule of Law pressing on us so--that we cannot bear the fact that we are breaking it, and consequently we try to shift the responsibility. For you notice it is only for our bad behavior that we find all these explanations. It is only our bad temper that we put down to being tired or worried or hungry; we put our good temper down to ourselves." ~C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity
"By and large we do know right from wrong, but wish we didn't. We only make believe we are searching for truth-so that we can do wrong, condone wrong, or suppress our remorse for having done wrong in the past." ~J. Budziszewski, The Revenge of Conscience
Posted by: Sam | February 27, 2013 at 11:40 AM
Brad B.
Thanks for the verses from Ephesians.
I realise now I was unclear - I meant 'how do behaviours matter to Calvinists'.
But those are great passages!
Thanks WL. Lots to ponder!
Thanks for the quotes, Sam. Taken a copy of them!
Posted by: Peter Northcott | February 27, 2013 at 12:15 PM
Great post, Amy.
Posted by: John M | February 27, 2013 at 01:14 PM
Peter, if you're asking in terms of the post (i.e., regarding the question of getting into heaven), our behavior matters in that nobody will enter heaven alone on the basis of his behavior, contrary to the man's belief that I referred to.
I wasn't addressing behavior after salvation, which seems to be the different question you're asking. Behavior both before and after salvation was covered by Brad in his quotes of Ephesians above. After salvation, God of course still cares about our behavior, so thankfully our union with Christ (who perfectly meets His standard) continues just as it began--by grace.
The security of our union with Christ in no way negates the fact that we were recreated by God in salvation to do good works, as Ephesians says (see also Romans 6, Colossians 3, and Titus for why we set aside sin in order to reflect the truth and goodness of God and the gospel).
Posted by: Amy | February 27, 2013 at 01:23 PM
Thanks for the important clarification and additional points, Amy! I see what you're getting at now.
I'm just drowning a bit in all the different teachings that seem so confusing!
Posted by: Peter Northcott | February 28, 2013 at 02:09 AM
You might have some added confusion if you're hearing explanations of Calvinism from people who aren't Calvinists. For whatever reason, I rarely hear a fair representation that way. It does happen sometimes, but it's rare. There's just a lot of misunderstanding out there. If you'd like to read a fairly brief summary to get a better handle on it, try this.
Posted by: Amy | February 28, 2013 at 09:51 AM
Thanks for the link, Amy. It's very helpful.
It seems to me that few positions are represented fairly across the denominational divides.
I suppose being an Ambassador requires that we don't do this, and so what we have to do instead is something to ponder...
Posted by: Peter Northcott | March 01, 2013 at 06:31 PM