« Links Mentioned on the 5/18/16 Show | Main | Links Mentioned on the 5/20/16 Show »

May 19, 2016

Comments

Not only for the verb design, but also for the verb love, FWIW.....

"Not only for the verb design, but also for the verb love"

what?! Hilarious. Its absolutely clear you arent quite right. You wont answer reasonable questions and are simply a massive waste of time. You are the best advert for ID ever.

It's not ID.

It's wide arrays of converging Networks.

What?

So its Intelligent "wide arrays of converging networks"?

What. on. earth. are. you. on. about.?

Ask Gerald.

You are so odd it is impossible to have a conversation with you. You won't state what you think apart from incoherent and inaccurate philosophy.

What others online have said about you online is entirely accurate. Your posts are confused, rambling and over verbose.

Actually, Gerald's logic is very well spoken and laid out. I actually don't disagree with his terms, his verbs, and their referents, and hence apply them. Consistently. Doing so carries us where it carries us,

Round and round and round........

So why do you think biological organisms are designed?!

One last attempt to get you to answer a straightforward question.

I just told you: Because of an un-searchable array of Networks, an ontological history of becoming, verbs, the referents of those verbs, nature's fundamental causes/forces, and semantic consistency. Perhaps you can read the previous X-hundred or so comments here to tease that out. It's too much to copy/paste. I mean, really.

"Because of an un-searchable array of Networks, an ontological history of becoming, verbs, the referents of those verbs, nature's fundamental causes/forces, and semantic consistency."

But that is meaningless waffle.

I mean "ontological history of becoming"? Just ridiculous clever sounding GARBAGE - I know my philosophy, and science, and you do not.

Ok you are an utter waste of time. Bye.

I kind of liked those terms and nuances. Gerald is very insightful. And his writing is just fun to read, being adept at it as he is. He's worth reading.

It's all the same. From the universe with the minded observer all streaming from the epicenter of Big Bang cosmology to Network after Network after Network to Laptops to Ford Edges. It's not I.D. It's un-searchable array of Networks, an ontological history of becoming, verbs, the referents of those verbs, nature's fundamental causes/forces, and semantic consistency. It's not I.D. It's semantic consistency constituting the verb "design".

Add the word "an" ....

It's all the same. From the universe with the minded observer all streaming from the epicenter of Big Bang cosmology to Network after Network after Network to Laptops to Ford Edges. It's not I.D. It's an un-searchable array of Networks, an ontological history of becoming, verbs, the referents of those verbs, nature's fundamental causes/forces, and semantic consistency. It's not I.D. It's semantic consistency constituting the verb "design".

The comments to this entry are closed.